Debtorboards - Sue Your Creditor and Win!

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

TO DATE DEBTORBOARDS MEMBERS HAVE COLLECTED $449,646.12 FROM CREDITORS
AND HAVE BEATEN BACK SUITS ATTEMPTING TO COLLECT $387,659.55 FROM THEM.

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Defending against Collection Suits  (Read 3252 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Flyingifr

  • Lord High Cleaner of the Polo Ponies
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5029
  • Thank you Sears, NCO, AA and the rest for my toy
Defending against Collection Suits
« on: January 25, 2008 11:14:57 AM »
Our friends at Edelman Combs posted this gem, and I think it should be required reading.

http://www.edcombs.com/CM/Custom/collection.defense.1-2008.pdf

BTW-the Flyingifr Method does work. (quoted from Hannah on Infinite Credit, September 19, 2006)

I think of a telephone as a Debt Collector's crowbar. With such a device it is possible to pry one's mouth open wide enough to allow the insertion of a foot or two.

Morality of Debt? No one ever went to Hell for not paying a debt.

Founder of the Credit Terrorist Training Camp (Debtorboards)

foolsmission

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 1055
Re: Defending against Collection Suits
« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2008 11:38:13 PM »
With all due respect to ya'll UCC haters amongst us.
 :lildevil:

Take this:
Quote
C. State law rights are better. The sale of accounts receivable is regulated by
Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code.
1. Send a certified or faxed letter requesting assignment or assignments
necessary to show title in plaintiff under UCC §9-406, 810 ILCS 5/9-
406. The way §9-406 is written the debt buyer is not entitled to payment
unless it provides a copy of the assignment(s). Wait about 10 days after
receipt and then move to dismiss on the ground that there is no obligation
to pay.
2. Section 9-210 of the Uniform Commercial Code gives right to accounting,
defined as breakdown of what debt consists of. Debt buyer does not have
option to cease collection. There is $500 statutory damages for
noncompliance, albeit only individually.
« Last Edit: January 26, 2008 12:02:42 PM by Admin1781 »
Court says vaccine is not to blame for autism.
"It was abundantly clear that petitioners' theories of causation were speculative and unpersuasive,"
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090212/ap_on_he_me/autism_ruling

Flyingifr

  • Lord High Cleaner of the Polo Ponies
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5029
  • Thank you Sears, NCO, AA and the rest for my toy
Re: Defending against Collection Suits
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2008 11:43:24 AM »
Keep in mind that Mr Edelman is, in most cases, addressing ILLINOIS law only. Your State Laws may vary.
BTW-the Flyingifr Method does work. (quoted from Hannah on Infinite Credit, September 19, 2006)

I think of a telephone as a Debt Collector's crowbar. With such a device it is possible to pry one's mouth open wide enough to allow the insertion of a foot or two.

Morality of Debt? No one ever went to Hell for not paying a debt.

Founder of the Credit Terrorist Training Camp (Debtorboards)

foolsmission

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 1055
Re: Defending against Collection Suits
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2008 01:13:24 PM »
Oh there you go again confusing (me) the ignorantly bliss, with facts.
Court says vaccine is not to blame for autism.
"It was abundantly clear that petitioners' theories of causation were speculative and unpersuasive,"
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090212/ap_on_he_me/autism_ruling

phoenix2ny

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 366
Re: Defending against Collection Suits
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2008 05:22:54 PM »
Another little gem. I'm going to post the link in the NY section. At first glance it may seem to all be about IL, but there are a lot of NY case sites in there.

woeisme

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 31
Re: Defending against Collection Suits
« Reply #5 on: February 23, 2008 01:22:15 AM »
that was what Im looking for...but for texas.

Mischievous Smurfy

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 4498
    • WWW
Ease of Use - Multiple Listings - CaseLaw - Uncle Normie's Hot Seat
[Primary Violation = a violation I would sue for] [Secondary Violation = a violation I would sue for only along with a Primary Violation]

dharkheart

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 134
Re: Defending against Collection Suits
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2008 04:58:18 PM »
Our friends at Edelman Combs posted this gem, and I think it should be required reading.

http://www.edcombs.com/CM/Custom/collection.defense.1-2008.pdf




Man, I wish there was one of these for Michigan!  Sure would make pro per a lot easier :D

terry

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 3
Re: Defending against Collection Suits
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2008 03:07:00 AM »
I have a judgement against me.  Does FTC rules still apply in regards to them telling me that they can get an arrest warrant out on me and put me in jail?  If they can't, should I use this to reduce or even eliminate this judgement debt?

Mischievous Smurfy

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 4498
    • WWW
Re: Defending against Collection Suits
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2008 04:28:44 AM »
There are very few instances where they can have you thrown in jail for not paying anything, even a judgment.  Those would have to be along the lines of child support or court ordered fines.

If the judgment is something more middle of the road ....  a non government party owns a judgment, then no they cannot have you thrown in jail.

Yes the FDCPA still applies, yes you can use this as leverage.  Sue them for the violations, refuse to settle unless the settlement includes dissmissal or retraxit of the the judgment.

Hard to be more specific without details about what the judgment is for.
Ease of Use - Multiple Listings - CaseLaw - Uncle Normie's Hot Seat
[Primary Violation = a violation I would sue for] [Secondary Violation = a violation I would sue for only along with a Primary Violation]
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.09 seconds with 22 queries.

Hosting provided by Blutos Webhosting